Existentialism in My Eyes Essay Example

Existentialism in My Eyes Essay Example Existentialism in My Eyes Essay Existentialism in My Eyes Essay To get down with I would wish to briefly what the dictionary defines as existential philosophy. A philosophical theory or attack that emphasizes the being of the single individual as a free and responsible agent finding their ain development through Acts of the Apostless of the will ( merriam-webster ) . It is a a 20thcentury philosophical motion that places the chief accent on the being of worlds. Existentialism calls attending to freedom of action and freedom of pick. Harmonizing to this theory one is ever free to move in any manner he or she volitions and should non see others actions. ideas or positions in making so. Since every individual in considered to purchase into the universe entirely and thena addition die alone they are non expected to be gracious or considerate to the people around them. Esentially we are all responsible for our ain being. However existential philosophy is so obscure in its definition because it is viewed so otherwise by so many people. Not merely bookmans but those who study the term every bit good. The fathers of existential philosophy are said to be ; Soren Kierkegaard and Friedrich Nietzsche. although the phenomenological version of it begins in Heidegger. who vehemently denied being an existential philosopher. Sartre. and continues through Kafka and Camus. Since most existentialist minds neer used that word to depict their doctrines. Sartre did. but supposedly rejected the term on his deathbed. you will happen some differences between them However existential philosophy and those who live it tend to hold certain features harmonizing to most bookmans: Â ¦they are obsessed with how to populate one’s life and believe that philosophical and psychological enquiry can assist. Â ¦they believe there are certain inquiries that everyone must cover with ( if they are to take human life earnestly ) . and that these are particular - experiential - inquiries. Questions such as decease. the significance of human being. the topographic point of God in human being. the significance of value. interpersonal relationship. the topographic point of self-reflective witting cognition of one’s ego in bing. Note that the existential philosophers on this word picture don’t pay much attending to social inquiries such as the political relations of life and what social duty the society or province has. They focus about entirely on the person. Â ¦By and big Existentialists believe that life is really hard and that it doesn’t have an objective or universally known value. but that the single must make value by affiriming it and populating it. non by speaking about it. Â ¦Existential picks and values are chiefly demonstrated in ACT non in words. Â ¦Given that one is concentrating on single being and the existential struggles ( that is. in doing determinations that are meaningful in mundane life ) . they frequently find that literary word pictures instead than more abstract philosophical thought. are the best ways to clarify experiential battles. Â ¦They tend to take freedom of the will. the human power to make or non make. as perfectly obvious. Now and once more there are statements for free will in Existentialist literature. but even in these statements. one gets the distinguishable sense that the statements are non for themselves. but for outsiders. Inside the motion. free will is self-evident. it is intuitively obvious. it is the background of all else that goes on. There are surely exclusions to each of these things. but this is kind of a placing of the existentialist-like places. ( Corbett. 1985 ) . Existenitialism focuses on several rules. nevertheless there are three major 1s ; Subjectivity. Anguish. and Forlornness. Subjectivity is the first rule of Existentialism. Subjectivity means the name we are given when charges are brought up against us. This thought that we are born with a program in head. It is what we will do for ourselves for our hereafter. You neer know where your life is traveling to take you. Angusish is the feeling that Satre made mention to when we realize that we are wholly reponsible for non merely our ain being but all of world. When we speak of forlornness’ . a term Heidegger seemed to utilize frequently. we mean merely that God does non be and that we. ust face the consquence of that world. that God is non responsible for our being but we are The feeling of forlornness roots from an individual’s realisation that people are entirely in the universe. unable to trust on anything perfectly or anyone. Though these three are the major rules I I personally value the thought of genuineness that existential philosophy seems to concentrate on. It fits absolutely in modern society It allows the thought that being true to one’s character. personality. and picks is required to be reliable Modern twenty-four hours society has created cooky cutter frontages that has us all boxed into functions and categorizations. Which is why most modern twenty-four hours philosophers tend to see traditional and academic political orientations as excessively abstract or remote for current society. I sometimes think it’s non the theories that are distant but the uppitiness of the tusk tower in its presentation that makes them look excessively hard to get the hang. However to me it’s like the 2+2 theory. that the beginnings of philosophical idea must stem from human experience. Another reply is that the authentic attitude is really simple. It strips off the complications of people stating you how to populate and what to make and who you should be. It’s appealing to those surrounded or overwhelmed by the blare of voices in today’s society. particularly to immature people. It is the look of freedom in a universe of restraints. Again. Sartre might hold rejected some of this as being non what he meant by genuineness. But truly the point is that these attitudes are popular. I think I should travel back to the beginning once more. What does genuineness intend? Possibly. for the reliable individual. one’s moral visual aspect is at all times in all topographic points and in all respects one’s moral world. The reliable individual lives harmonizing to her ain moral criterions. does non feign to be something she is non. does non make the apppearance of morality but in their bosom be in private debauched. This. to me. is the most appealing definition of genuineness. When it comes to specifying truth. Existentialism has twosome of points. To get down with. truth is defined by a individual single life experiences. Their world and experiences influences their ultimate position on the universe. It is considered that to see of the universe is already the truth and in their world it is. This is because in Existentialism truth is something that is based on facts and non on emotions. Though. the truth can be used in a good manner or bad manner. so to state moving in good or bad religion. Therefore. in the construct of truth it is one time once more pointed out that every person has a freedom of pick. It is interesting that Existentialism considers an act to be good and something to be true if it is performed in a manner that the full human race would be represented. This seems to be adequate to certify an act as a moral one. Modern existential philosophy seems to demo up frequently in movies. One must non confound Existentialism and Post Modernism though. Key thoughts include 1. Retaining genuineness in a mechanical. apathetic universe is dejected. because autencitiy relates to a world that merely does non be. 2. The feelings of disaffection and solitariness that come about from being alone in a universe of many. and the consiciousness of decease. 3. Everydayness Referemces 1. Corbett B. . 1985. What is Existentialism? Retrieved december 21. 2012 from hypertext transfer protocol: //www2. Webster. edu/~corbetre/philosophy/existentialism/whatis. hypertext markup language.